Archive for the ‘ Information Literacy ’ Category

Free Speech Debate Proposes 10 Draft Principles, What Will Be No. 11?

The Free Speech Debate has recently proposed ten draft principles, while leaving the 11th (and perhaps further) slot open for – surprise surprise – debate:

  1. We – all human beings – must be free and able to express ourselves, and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas, regardless of frontiers.
  2. We defend the internet and all other forms of communication against illegitimate encroachment of public and private powers.
  3. We require and create open, diverse media so we can make well informed decisions and participate fully in political life.
  4. We seek openly and with civility about all kinds of human difference.
  5. We allow no taboos in the discussion and dissemination of knowledge.
  6. We neither make threats of violence nor accept violent intimidation.
  7. We respect the believer but not necessarily the content of the belief.
  8. We are all entitled to a private life but should accept such scrutiny as in the public interest.
  9. We should be able to counter slurs on our reputations without stifling legitimate debate.
  10. We must be free to challenge all limits of freedom of expression and information justified on such grounds as national security, public order, morality, and the protection of intellectual property.
  11. What is missing? What would you propose? Join the global conversation…

The list and corresponding discussion reminded me of something I posted on this blog a while ago: Blasphemy, Free Speech, and Dangerous Things.
In this post, I argued that due to the nature of discourse, not all “speeches” are equal in the manner that some are more powerful than others. Keeping this in mind, the argument continues, free speech should be treated as part of a bigger whole; society should understand the power that speech hold; and this great freedom/right/privilege/power is productive only when set in a suitable framework (through education, information and media literacy, etc.), which (for example) protects the less-powerful and less-privileged or educates also about the power and dangers that accompany free speech.

In light of this argumentation, this is the proposal I made for principle no. 11:

We acknowledge that free speech is a mean to an end and not an end in itself.

Furthermore, we emphasize that free speech is a right that withholds considerable power. Therefore it should be treated as part of a whole, combined with information and media literacy, access to education, etc.
(See http://drawer20.wordpress.com/2012/10/03/blasphemy-free-speech-and-dangerous-things/)

Do you have other suggestions? Here’s where you can express them!

Robin who?!

I was following the theft story of the mathematics high school final exams (sorry, still working on finding a link in English) in Israel full with admiration.
The exam-form was leaked out, published on Facebook, and sold to students.

Why am I full with admiration? Let me explain…

We all did it, o.k.? We all tried to cheat on tests, get copies of them and so on, but that is also not the thing.

These are times in which the most profitable companies don’t produce real products. Instead they recognize an information need in society, get (please note: gets, not produce!) this information, develop tools to manage it and sell it as a service.
Those kids were clever enough to find out a market-need for specific information, knew where and how to get it, used the right tools to publish it and made a profit by selling it. They also did it disregarding the class-divide that they were reproducing (don’t worry, I’ll get to that). Like everything in today’s world, it was made on a large scale – not just at the few nearby schools, but across the country.

That’s not being a brat, that’s just playing by the rules, of capitalism.

When we think about it on a brighter scale, they did it with disregard to the fact that they were further increasing the class-divide. It’s been a while since I’ve used my math skills, but I’ll try it anyway:

  • You have spare money to buy the exam and of course can afford having a computer and internet at home (they call it middle and upper class these days) = you can buy the exam
  • You have the exam form = you’ll get a better mark in the exam
  • You have a better mark in math = higher chances to get in to the university
  • If   A=B, B=C and C=D   than  A=D, and that means:
  • You have money = your chance for higher education increases

Let me tell you about something called…

Information literacy.
There are different models for it, but we can sum it up by saying it’s the ability to:

  1. recognize ones information need
  2. choose the right sources/tools to find it (incl. being able to use those sources)
  3. organize the information
  4. select the most relevant information
  5. present the information (after processing it)

Other competences like the old fashion read and write, knowing how to use the computer (computer literacy), the internet (internet literacy), the library etc. – are all tools to accomplish the overall  information literacy.

Nowadays schools have less to do with conveying information (as an object) to the students and more to do with conveying information literacy to the students.

So did the schools do a good job on those kids? Indeed, they made it through all 5 factors!

But wait, there is one more factor that crosses all of those abilities, and that is the ethical use of information.

Not being ethical has many names, in the academic world we call it plagiarism, the entertainment world calls it file-sharing (although the record companies and film industry were so, and I mean sooooooo, unethical for all those years, so I can’t say they don’t deserve it) and the Chinese call it  检查员 (censor).

So that’s where, in my opinion, the system failed.
And when saying system I don’t mean just the education system. That thingy with information literacy is a co-operation of the education system and the parents. Sadly enough the parents, who grew up in a totally different era (concerning  information) are having big trouble facing the challenge of the new generation of information literacy and information ethics.

Let me make you an offer you can’t refuse

Information literacy can and should go far beyond the model I’ve briefly summarized here. Information literacy is also about knowing which information is suitable for a person, how that person can use it ethically, legally and without harming himself and others.

The key to avoiding abuse of information is not limiting access to it, but to educate the ones that are concerned with how and when, if at all, they should use it.

And that doesn’t have to do just with the stolen exam; it’s about censorship, internet filtering, pornography, file-sharing, leaking secrets of national security to the press, handling personal information (of ourselves and of others) and the list just keeps on going…

The times have changed; we have a wide world of information at our fingertips and the old fashion control mechanisms just can’t supply the goods anymore. If we want information to be used properly it’s all about education, it’s about the system (again, I mean both the education system and the parents) stepping in and working on that other factor of information literacy.

Because the bottom line is that the younger the kids, the better their ability to use Google and Wiki.
And leaving us way behind while doing so.

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 384 other followers

%d bloggers like this: